The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered an accelerated hearing in the high-stakes trial of six individuals accused of plotting to overthrow President Bola Tinubu’s administration.
Justice Joyce Abdulmalik fixed April 29, April 30, May 4 and May 5 for the commencement of trial proceedings, alongside hearings on bail applications filed by the defendants.
At the resumed session, the Attorney General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), told the court the prosecution was ready to proceed, noting that witnesses were available, depending on the court’s schedule.
However, the court ruled that the trial would begin before any consideration of bail applications.
Defence counsel raised concerns over the timeline. Lawyers representing some of the accused including Paul Erokoro, A.I. Yeru and N.S. Diri argued that the notice period was too short, citing the complexity of the charges.
Despite the objections, Justice Abdulmalik directed all parties to agree on dates to ensure a speedy trial and subsequently confirmed the accelerated hearing schedule.
Charges and Defendants
The Federal Government arraigned the six defendants last week on a 13-count charge bordering on treason, terrorism, failure to disclose security intelligence and alleged terrorism financing.
The accused persons include, Major General Ibrahim Gana (retd), Retired naval captain Erasmus Victor, Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim, Zekeri Umoru, Bukar Goni and Abdulkadir Sani.
All defendants pleaded not guilty.
Following their plea, the prosecution requested their remand in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS), which the court granted.
Alleged Coup Plot
According to the charge filed by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, the defendants allegedly conspired in 2025 to “levy war against the state” with the aim of overthrowing the President.
The offence is punishable under Section 37(2) of the Criminal Code.
Also named in the charge, but currently at large, is former Minister of Petroleum, Timipre Sylva.
Transparency Concerns
Meanwhile, concerns have emerged over transparency in the proceedings after journalists were barred from covering earlier sessions of the trial.
Court correspondents were left uncertain about developments, particularly regarding pending bail applications.
The case continues amid heightened public interest, given its national security implications.
