A Federal High Court in Abuja heard on Tuesday how the proscribed Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, admitted operating an illegal radio station and inciting members of the public to attack police officers.
An official of the Department of State Services (DSS) said this while testifying as the second prosecution witness (PW2) in Nnamdi Kanu’s ongoing terrorism trial before Justice James Omotosho.
The witness, identified with the acronym BBB, testified behind a screen provided by the court. He said Nnamdi Kanu confirmed his activities while giving his statement.
Led in evidence by prosecuting lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), BBB said besides being the leader of the proscribed IPOB, Kanu is the founder of the Eastern Security Network (ESN), the armed wing of IPOB.
The witness said Kanu also operated an illegal radio station, which broadcast on frequencies 102.1 FM and 88.0 FM. He said the radio was illegal because it was not licensed by the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC).
BBB said he was on July 2021, assigned the duty of taking Kanu’s statement following a letter from the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) requesting that the IPOB leader be investigated for his alleged terrorism activities.
The witness said he carried out the assignment in the company of four other colleagues. He said he handed Kanu the letter from the AGF, which the defendant read and also gave his lawyers to read, following which he requested that Kanu respond to the issues raised in the letter.
He said that after reading the letter, Kanu volunteered to make a statement in the presence of two of his lawyers, including Alloy Ejimakor.
The witness said he played some of the broadcasts made by the defendant on his radio station (Radio Biafra), including where he called for the attack on police officers and made other inciting comments.
Witness BBB said Nnamdi Kanu admitted that the voice in the broadcast, which was played to his hearing, was his (Kanu’s) own.
On what Kanu was agitating about, the witness said Nnamdi Kanu wanted the secession of the five South East states, parts of Kogi and Benue states, from the rest of Nigeria.
The witness said the defendant’s statement-taking session was recorded on video.
At that point, Awomolo showed the witness a copy of a compact disc, which BBB identified as containing the recording of his interaction with Nnamdi Kanu.
Awomolo then applied to tender the letter from the AGF, the disc, and a certificate of compliance.
But, lawyer to the defence, Kanu Agabi (SAN) objected to the prosecution’s application to tender the items, arguing that the defence was not served with the AGF letter and the video recording.
Agabi said it was part of the right of the defendant to be given copies of all documents and materials that the prosecution planned to rely on in prosecuting the case.
Awomolo said he was ready to furnish the defendant with all the necessary documents and materials that the prosecution wishes to rely on.
Ruling, Justice James Omotosho held that the defence was entitled to all the documents and materials the prosecution planned to rely on.
Justice Omotosho proceeded to order the prosecution to, in line with the provision of Section 36 of the Constitution, serve on the defendant all facilities, including documents that it intends to rely on to prosecute the case.
Upon an application by Awomolo, Justice Omotosho adjourned till May 7 to enable the prosecution to serve the defence with all the necessary documents and for the PW 2 to continue his testimony.
