The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court in Abuja, Justice John Tsoho, has reassigned the case of the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, to another judge.
Aloy Ejimakor, Kanu’s lead counsel, stated this in an Abuja statement on Saturday.
Kanu had sought that Justice Binta Nyako, who was sitting over the Federal Government’s seven-count terrorism indictment against him, recuse herself.
While Justice Nyako recused herself from the trial and returned the case file to the Chief Judge for reassignment, the case was later given to her again.
Kanu was opposed to having his case sent to Nyako, requesting that a fresh judge hear it.
On February 20, the IPOB leader, through his legal team, wrote to Nigeria’s Chief Justice, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, requesting her involvement.
Ejimakor stated in the statement that on Friday, March 7, the legal team got two separate letters concerning Kanu’s case.
The statement read, “We received two separate official letters regarding his case. The letters are momentous and somewhat pyrrhic.
“One letter was from the Honourable Chief Justice of Nigeria, responding to a recent letter we had written to her, seeking her prompt administrative intervention (as the administrative head of the Nigerian judiciary) on the matter of a proper and lawful reassignment of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s case, following the recusal of the judge that was conducting it.
“The other letter was from the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, informing us that the case has been reassigned to another judge of the Federal High Court.”
Ejimakor claimed that after receiving the letters, Kanu directed his legal team to publicly express his heartfelt gratitude to the CJN for her sound administrative discretion and fast response to their request.
“He also expressed his profound appreciation to members of the general public who publicly supported our righteous demands that Kanu’s case be reassigned to another judge, as the law demands.
“To be clear, Kanu has always been ready to stand trial because he is firmly convinced of his innocence. However, the perverse events of the past six months (from September 2024, when the recusal happened) posed significant dangers to his constitutional rights, particularly his right to a fair and speedy hearing.
It was in light of this that we resorted to taking extraordinary measures to ensure that his case is properly reassigned and conducted in accordance with the law. Now that the authorities have taken the initial steps to uphold the law, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and his legal team will take stock and focus on zealous preparation for his defense,” Ejimakor stated.
